- Acura
- Alfa Romeo
- Aston Martin
- Audi
- Bentley
- BMW
- Buick
- Cadillac
- Chevrolet
- Chrysler
- Dodge
- Ferrari
- Fiat
- Ford
- Genesis
- GMC
- Honda
- Hyundai
- Infiniti
- Jaguar
- Jeep
- Kia
- Lamborghini
- Land Rover
- Lexus
- Lincoln
- Lotus
- Lucid
- Maserati
- Maybach
- Mazda
- McLaren
- Mercedes-Benz
- MINI
- Mitsubishi
- Nissan
- Pagani
- Porsche
- Ram
- Rivian
- Rolls-Royce
- SMART
- Subaru
- Tesla
- Toyota
- Volkswagen
- Volvo
Here's How 10 Small SUVs Ranked in New Front Crash Tests
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has revamped its vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention tests to better simulate high-speed and more varied crash scenarios, including collisions with motorcycles and large trucks. This update responds to the growing presence of automatic emergency braking (AEB) systems in new vehicles, which have significantly reduced the rate of front-to-rear crashes. The new testing regime incorporates higher speeds of 31, 37, and 43 mph and evaluates the effectiveness of AEB systems against different types of vehicles.
In the latest round of tests, ten small SUVs were assessed but only one stood out:
This article was co-written using AI and was then heavily edited and optimized by our editorial team.
Here's How 10 Small SUVs Ranked in New Front Crash Tests
Photo credit: Subaru
Subaru Forester
Good Rating Photo credit: Subaru
Honda CR-V
Acceptable Rating Photo credit: Honda
Toyota RAV4
Acceptable Rating Photo credit: Toyota
Ford Escape
Marginal Rating Photo credit: Ford
Hyundai Tucson
Marginal Rating Photo credit: Hyundai
Jeep Compass
Marginal Rating Photo credit: Jeep
Chevrolet Equinox
Poor Rating Photo credit: Chevrolet
Mazda CX-5
Poor Rating Photo credit: Mazda
Mitsubishi Outlander
Poor Rating Photo credit: Mitsubishi
Volkswagen Taos
Poor Rating Photo credit: Volkswagen